Stadt Papenburg v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland Pays/Territoire Union européenne, Allemagne Type de cour Cour internationale Date Jan 14, 2010 Source UNEP, InforMEA Nom du tribunal European Court of Justice Siège de la cour Luxembourg Juge Bonichot, J.C.Timmermans, C.W.A.Schiemann, K.Klūris, P.Bay Larsen, L.Sharpston, E. Numéro de référence C-226/08 Langue Allemand Sujet Environnement gén., Espèces sauvages et écosystèmes Mot clé Normes Flore sauvage Planification environnementale Normes environnementales Faune sauvage Préservation de l'écosystème Résumé Advocate General Sharpston presented her opinion in a reference for a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of the Habitats Directive. The case concerns the inclusion of parts of the river Ems in the draft list of sites of Community importance (SCIs) in the Atlantic region for which the Commission has requested the agreement of the Federal Government of Germany. Before the referring court, the municipality of Papenburg argued that its right to self-government, which is protected under Article 28(2) GG (German Basic Law), would be infringed by Germany agreeing, pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) of the Habitats Directive, to the draft list of SCIs in the Atlantic region drawn up by the Commission. Advocate General advised the Court to interpret Article 4(2) of the Habitats Directive in a way that its scopedoes not allow a Member State to refuse to agree to the Commission's draft list of sites of Community importance on grounds other than nature conservation. Texte intégral liste.jsf Références Cite Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora Législation | Union européenne | 1992 (2013) Mot clé: Préservation de l'écosystème, Aire protégée, Biodiversité, Protection de l'habitat, Faune sauvage, Flore sauvage, Gestion/conservation, Espèces menacées, Chasse/capture, Équipement de chasse/méthodes de chasse, Collecte de données/déclarations, Protection des espèces Source: FAO, FAOLEX