Ozone and particulate matter - NAAQS Symposium (series of articles) Auteur various authors Périodique/Collection Tulane Environmental Law Journal | Vol. 11(2); 181 - 424; 244 p. Date 1998 Source IUCN (ID: ANA-063570) Éditeur | Lieu de publication Tulane University Law School | New Orleans, LA, USA Type du document Article en publication périodique Langue Anglais Pays/Territoire États-Unis d'Amérique Sujet Air et atmosphère, Déchets et substances dangereuses Mot clé Santé publique Qualité de l'air/pollution de l'air Normes de qualité de l'air Substances dangereuses Émissions Résumé - Introduction: The new national standards for ozone and particles: Modest public health progress or public policy meltdown? - The impracticality and immorality of cost-benefit analysis in setting health-related standards - Should Congress direct the EPA to allow serious harms to public health to continue?: Cost-benefit tests and NAAQS under the Clean Air Act - The Clean Air Act under regulatory reform - Turning two blind eyes: The EPA 's failure to consider costs and health disbenefits in revising the ozone standard - The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act and the Regulatory Flexibility Act: Could a single word doom the new NAAQS? - The EPA 's regional haze proposal: Protecting visibility in national parks and wilderness areas - Mandating the release of health research data: Issues and implications - Implementing the new eight-hour NAAQs for ozone - What happened to the 1990 Clean Air Act? - Old west justice: Federalism and clean air regulation 1970-1998 - A review of national ozone and particulate matter air quality standards in light of long-standing California air quality standards