Ecolex Logo
Le portail au
droit de l'environnement
Résultats de la recherche » Jurisprudence

State v Stefan Frylinck

Pays/Territoire
Afrique du Sud
Type de cour
Nationale- cour inférieure
Date
Avr 6, 2011
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Nom du tribunal
North Gauteng High Court
Juge
Patterson
Numéro de référence
14/1740/2010
Langue
Anglais
Sujet
Questions juridiques, Environnement gén.
Mot clé
Mise en application Infractions/sanctions
Résumé
The charges against Frylinck, an environmental consultant representing Mpofu Environmental Solutions CC, and Mpofu originated from the planned construction of the Pan African Parliament in Midrand. In 2009, the DEA stopped the construction of the complex when it was discovered that construction was causing serious damage to a wetland on the site. Environmental Management Inspectors laid criminal charges against Frylinck who compiled the basic environmental assessment on which the decision to allow building was based for not pointing out the existence of a wetland to authorities. Officials who consider EIA applications have to rely at least in part on the integrity and honesty of the consultants who provide information to them, and the quality of the work done by those consultants. Where that integrity is violated and the work does not meet the required standard, whether through intent or negligence, it is imperative that decisive punishment is meted out as deterrent to others.
Texte intégral
COU-159329.pdf