SITA EcoService Nederland BV, formerly Verol Recycling Limburg BV v. Minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer (VROM) Pays/Territoire Union européenne, Pays-Bas Type de cour Cour internationale Date Avr 3, 2003 Source UNEP, InforMEA Nom du tribunal European Court of Justice Siège de la cour Luxembourg Juge Wathelet, M.Timmermans, C.W.A.La Pergola, A.Jann, P.Rosas, A.Jacobs, F.G. Numéro de référence C-116/01 Langue Néerlandais Sujet Environnement gén., Déchets et substances dangereuses Mot clé Technologie environnementale Gestion des déchets Recyclage/réemploi Élimination de déchets Résumé In the preliminary ruling on the case filed by the Dutch Council of State, the ECJ found that only the first step in the waste treatment process in casu incineration - determines the waste treatment process classification (disposal or recovery). Referring to a recent judgment in the similar case C-228/00 Commission v Germany, the calorific value of the waste does not form a relevant criterion in this respect. Instead the three conditions formulated in case C-228/00 need to be checked: 1 main purpose of operation must be enabling the waste to be used as a means of generating energy, 2 conditions of operation must indicate that it is indeed a means to generate energy and 3 waste must be used principally as a fuel or other means of generating energy). The ECJ does not explain whether the caloric value could play a role under one or more of these three conditions. Texte intégral liste.jsf