Ecolex Logo
Le portail au
droit de l'environnement
Résultats de la recherche » Jurisprudence

Sasol Oil (Pty) Ltd and Another v Metcalfe No 2004 (5) SA 161 (W)

Pays/Territoire
Afrique du Sud
Type de cour
Nationale - cour supérieure
Date
Sep 16, 2005
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Nom du tribunal
The Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
Juge
Cachalia Aja
Numéro de référence
No. 368/2004
Langue
Anglais
Sujet
Agriculture et développement rural, Questions juridiques, Environnement gén.
Résumé

‘Protection of the environment ─ Prohibition on undertaking of environmentally detrimental activities without written authorisation of competent authority as intended in s 22 of Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989 (ECA) ─ Scope of mandate of competent authority; - the words ‘storage’ and ‘handling’ facility for dangerous and hazardous substances are broad enough to include a filling station. - decision taken in terms of policy guidelines not irrational ─ a party seeking to impugn rationality of decision must demonstrate exceptional basis to succeed in review application. - section 36(2) of ECA read in context, together with s 35, does not constitute a time bar to the institution of review proceedings after internal remedies have been exhausted.’

 

(Source: http://www.justice.gov.za/ )

Texte intégral
Sasol Oil (Pty) Ltd and Another v Metcalfe No 2004 (5) SA 161 (W).pdf
2004_368.pdf
Site web
www.justice.gov.za