New Jersey et al.v EPA. Pays/Territoire États-Unis d'Amérique Type de cour Nationale - cour supérieure Date Déc 20, 2011 Source UNEP, InforMEA Nom du tribunal United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Juge Rogers, Tatel and Brown. Numéro de référence No. 05-1097 Langue Anglais Sujet Déchets et substances dangereuses, Questions juridiques, Énergie Mot clé Conservation de l'énergie/production de l'énergie Responsabilité/indemnisation Substances dangereuses Résumé This is a motion for fees and costs under section 307(f) of the Clean Air Act, which authorizes courts to -- award costs of litigation (including reasonable attorney and expert witness fees) whenever they determine that such award is appropriate. In the underlying litigation, movants, a group of Native American tribes and tribal associations, intervened on behalf of petitioners who were challenging EPA rules regulating mercury emissions from power plants. See New Jersey v. EPA, 517 F.3d 574 (D.C. Cir. 2008). The Tribes also filed a petition for review challenging an ancillary regulation not at issue here. The Appeals Court vacated the mercury rules because it agreed with petitioners that the rules violated the Clean Air Act. Id. Petitioners sought fees, and EPA agreed to pay. The Appeals Court indicated, "Tribal Intervenors, who also pressed for vacatur, albeit on the basis of different arguments that we never reached, now ask us to order EPA to pay their fees and costs. EPA objects, claiming that Tribal Intervenors are ineligible for fee shifting. EPA also argues that even were Tribal Intervenors eligible, the size of their fee request is unreasonable and should be reduced by more than two-thirds. . . we conclude that Tribal Intervenors merit a fee award. We decline, however, to weigh in now on the appropriate amount; instead, we direct the parties to our Appellate Mediation Program." Texte intégral COU-159441.pdf