Ecolex Logo
Le portail au
droit de l'environnement
Résultats de la recherche » Jurisprudence

HFD:2005:1

Pays/Territoire
Finlande
Type de cour
Nationale - cour supérieure
Date
Jan 7, 2005
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Nom du tribunal
Högsta Förvaltningsdomstolen
Siège de la cour
Helsinki
Numéro de référence
HFD:2005:1
Langue
Finnois
Sujet
Espèces sauvages et écosystèmes
Mot clé
Gestion/conservation
Résumé

The case concerned whether or not it was possible to make an exception and permit hunting during the closed season under section 41, paragraph 2 of the Hunting Act.

 

The applicant had requested to be permitted to kill three specific lynx in order to protect nearby fur farms with minks and foxes. Lynx are protected wild species. This is one of the reasons why the state to a large extent covers losses that for example owners of farms have due to lynx and other predators. The ministry of agriculture and forestry, with a reference to the possibility of receiving compensation, concluded that there were no special circumstances necessitating an exception from the rules.

 

The applicant appealed the decision to the Supreme Administrative Court demanding permission to kill the lynx in question. In this instance, the applicant specified that the losses mentioned were not limited to killed farm animal, but perhaps even more due to disturbances to the breeding of animals. These losses are hard to estimate and prove. Therefore it is rare to receive compensation for them.

 

The Supreme Administrative Court began by stating that there is indeed a possibility to grant an exception to the prohibition of killing animals during the closed season if this is necessary to protect wild fauna or flora or to prevent particularly significant damage to crops, livestock, forestry, fisheries, reindeer husbandry, water or other property. However, this is provided that there is no other satisfactory solution and the decision is not detrimental to the maintenance of the species at a favourable conservation status in its natural range. A strong protection of the lynx is also advocated in the habitats directive. Important for the assessment was also the fact that several lynx had already been killed in the area in order to prevent damage.

Conclusively the court did not grant an exception, stating that it had not been shown that the exception was needed in order to prevent the damages.

Texte intégral
HFD-2005-1.pdf