Ecolex Logo
Le portail au
droit de l'environnement
Résultats de la recherche » Jurisprudence

FFAD - Entreprenorforeningens Affalds/Miljosektion, acting on behalf of Sydhavnens Sten & Grups ApS v. Kobenhavns Kommune

Pays/Territoire
Danemark, Union européenne
Type de cour
Cour internationale
Date
Mai 23, 2000
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Nom du tribunal
European Court of Justice
Siège de la cour
Luxembourg
Juge
Rodríguez Iglesias, G.C.
Moitinho de Almeida, J.C.
Edward, D.A.O.
Sevón, L.
Kapteyn, P.J.G.
Gulmann, C.
Jann, P.
Ragnemalm, H.
Wathelet,, M.
Léger, P.
Numéro de référence
C-209/98
Langue
Danois
Sujet
Environnement gén., Déchets et substances dangereuses
Mot clé
Prévention des déchets Déchets dangereux Santé publique Recyclage/réemploi Élimination de déchets Gestion des déchets
Résumé
The case dealt with national rules allowing a commune, in the interest of capacity utilisation and the profitability of a limited number of undertakings, to exclude an undertaking, which is in other respects qualified, from taking part in the recycling of certain types of non-hazardous waste. Among other things, the ECJ explained that Article 34 (now: 29) stands in the way of measures that hinder the export of non-hazardous waste; neither Article 36 (now: 30) nor the rectification at source principle from Article 130R (now: 174) para 2 can alter this if the life or health of humans, animals or plants is not endangered. Article 90 (now 86) jo. 86 (now 82) does not preclude a municipal measure that aims at solving an environmental problem and limits the number of waste treatment companies in order to ensure that they receive enough waste.
Texte intégral
liste.jsf