FFAD - Entreprenorforeningens Affalds/Miljosektion, acting on behalf of Sydhavnens Sten & Grups ApS v. Kobenhavns Kommune Pays/Territoire Danemark, Union européenne Type de cour Cour internationale Date Mai 23, 2000 Source UNEP, InforMEA Nom du tribunal European Court of Justice Siège de la cour Luxembourg Juge Rodríguez Iglesias, G.C.Moitinho de Almeida, J.C.Edward, D.A.O.Sevón, L.Kapteyn, P.J.G.Gulmann, C.Jann, P.Ragnemalm, H.Wathelet,, M.Léger, P. Numéro de référence C-209/98 Langue Danois Sujet Environnement gén., Déchets et substances dangereuses Mot clé Prévention des déchets Déchets dangereux Santé publique Recyclage/réemploi Élimination de déchets Gestion des déchets Résumé The case dealt with national rules allowing a commune, in the interest of capacity utilisation and the profitability of a limited number of undertakings, to exclude an undertaking, which is in other respects qualified, from taking part in the recycling of certain types of non-hazardous waste. Among other things, the ECJ explained that Article 34 (now: 29) stands in the way of measures that hinder the export of non-hazardous waste; neither Article 36 (now: 30) nor the rectification at source principle from Article 130R (now: 174) para 2 can alter this if the life or health of humans, animals or plants is not endangered. Article 90 (now 86) jo. 86 (now 82) does not preclude a municipal measure that aims at solving an environmental problem and limits the number of waste treatment companies in order to ensure that they receive enough waste. Texte intégral liste.jsf