Ecolex Logo
Le portail au
droit de l'environnement
Résultats de la recherche » Jurisprudence

Chief Bernard Ominayak, et al. v. Canada

Pays/Territoire
Canada
Type de cour
Autres
Date
Mai 10, 1990
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Nom du tribunal
UN Human Rights Committee
Siège de la cour
New York City
Numéro de référence
CCPR/C/38/D/167/1984
Langue
Anglais
Sujet
Terre et sols
Résumé

The leader of a Cree Indian Band living in Alberta, Canada argued that the State expropriated their land for commercial reasons despite the recognition that they had the right to continue their traditional way of life in the Indian Act of 1970 and Treaty 8 of 1899.

Members of the Cree Indian Band alleged that the expropriation breached articles 1 (right to self-determination and right to freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources), 7 (freedom from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment), 14 (right to a fair trial), 17 and 23 (right to respect for family life), 18 (freedom of religion) and 2 (freedom from discrimination) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

The state denied these allegations among others on the grounds that there were effective domestic remedies available to the applicants and that no irreparable damage was made to their traditional way of life.

The Committee found the applicants’ claims admissible and requested the State to take measures in order to avoid irreparable damage to the Cree Indian Band and its members. They pointed out that domestic litigation was not able to effectively restore their traditional way of life and would therefore be an ineffective remedy.

The Committee noted that many of the claims brought forward by the applicant were applying to Article 27 (rights of persons to engage in economic and social activities which are part of the culture of the community) of the ICCPR. Consequently, the Committee decided that recent developments on the Band’s traditional lands threatened their way of life and constituted a violation of Article 27. It also found that the State’s proposed remedy, the establishment of reserve land, was appropriate under Article 2 of the Covenant.

Texte intégral
www.globalhealthrights.org
Site web
www.globalhealthrights.org