Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, other applicants and the Vlaams Gewest relating to the operation of Bruxelles‑National Airport Pays/Territoire Belgique Type de cour Cour internationale Date Mar 17, 2011 Source UNEP, InforMEA Nom du tribunal European Court of Justice Siège de la cour Luxembourg Juge Tizzano, A:Kasel, J.-J.Borg Barthet, A.Ileič, MBergerMengozzi., P. Numéro de référence C-275/09 Langue Néerlandais Sujet Environnement gén. Mot clé Normes sur l'émission Sécurité environnementale Procédures judiciaires/procédures administratives Normes de qualité de l'eau Normes environnementales Normes Cour/tribunaux Normes relatives aux rejets d'effluents Normes acoustiques Émissions Résumé The Court rules that "the second indent of Article 1(2) of, and point 7 of Annex 1 to, Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997, are to be interpreted as meaning that the renewal of an existing permit to operate an airport cannot, in the absence of any works or interventions involving alterations to the physical aspect of the site, be classified as a ‘project or ‘construction, respectively, within the meaning of those provisions; however, it is for the national court to determine, on the basis of the national legislation applicable and taking account, where appropriate, of the cumulative effect of a number of works or interventions carried out since the entry into force of the directive, whether that permit forms part of a consent procedure carried out in several stages, the ultimate purpose of which is to enable activities which constitute a project within the meaning of the first indent of point 13 of Annex II, read in conjunction with point 7 of Annex I, to the directive to be carried out. If no assessment of the environmental effects of such works or interventions was carried out at the earlier stage in the consent procedure, it would be for the national court to ensure that the directive was effective by satisfying itself that such an assessment was carried out at the very least at the stage at which the operating permit was to be granted". Texte intégral Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest.pdf