Ecolex Logo
Le portail au
droit de l'environnement
Résultats de la recherche » Jurisprudence

A. vs Municipality of Ecublens

Pays/Territoire
Suisse
Type de cour
Nationale - cour supérieure
Date
Sep 27, 2013
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Nom du tribunal
First Administrative Court of the Federal Tribunal
Siège de la cour
Lausanne
Juge
NA
Numéro de référence
1C_637/2012 185/2013
Langue
Français
Sujet
Air et atmosphère, Déchets et substances dangereuses
Mot clé
Normes acoustiques Échange de droits d'émission Pollution atmosphérique (sources fixes) Normes sur l'émission Normes Normes environnementales Normes relatives aux rejets d'effluents Normes de qualité de l'eau Normes de qualité de l'air Émissions
Résumé

A. has operated for many years a coating plant in the Municipality of Ecublens. Residents of the area surrounding the plant complained about important disturbances regarding dust and odour emitted by this plant.

The cantonal authority competent for regulating air emission (the SEVEN) required the operator to comply with an emission limit value (50 mg/m3) with regard to its organic carbon emissions.

The operator brought an action against the decision taken by the SEVEN before the Administrative Tribunal of the Canton of Vaud. The Tribunal dismissed the applicant’s action ruling that the emission limit value was usually admitted in practice.

The applicant appealed this latest decision before the First Administrative Court of the Federal Tribunal on the basis that the emission limit value set by the SEVEN would not respect conditions laid down by the Federal Law on Environmental Protection and the Swiss Federal Ordinance on Air Pollution Control.

The Court applied the prevention principle and article 7 of the Federal Law on Environmental Protection establishing the principle of source-directed measures to limit air pollution. It ruled that emissions of organic substances must be measured in overall. According to the Court, the emission limit value was technically feasible and economically acceptable.

Therefore the Court dismissed the appeal.

Texte intégral
1C 637 2012.pdf