Common Programme Framework for Ending Drought Emergencies. País/Territorio Kenya Tipo de documento Fecha 2015 Fuente FAO, FAOLEX Materia Agricultura y desarrollo rural, Medio ambiente gen., Alimentación y nutrición, Bosques, Agua Palabra clave Política/planificación Participación pública Fortalecimiento de la capacidad Institución Educación Medidas financieras agrícolas Explotación agrícola Empleo rural Pobreza Uso sostenible Pastoreo Sistema de alerta rápida/sistema de intervención de emergencia Conservación del ecosistema Planificación ambiental Gobernanza Desertificación Escasez de agua/sequía Desastres Evaluación/manejo de riesgos Conservación de suelos/mejoramiento de suelos Saneamiento de suelos Cambio climático Seguridad alimentaria Forestación/reforestación Normas Bioseguridad Agroforestal Ordenación comunitaria Ordenación forestal/conservación de montes Zona de conservación de aguas Área geográphica Africa, AFRICA FAO, Africa Oriental Entry into force notes 2015-2030 Resumen The purpose of the EDE Common Programme Framework is to facilitate cooperation and synergy across sectors, actors, geographical areas and levels of operation, so that programming is more coherent, coordinated and efficient. One of the Overall Pillar Outcome is the enhanced resilience of Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASAL) livelihoods to the effects of drought and climate change through improvement in resilience and in long-term household food security (14.8). A common programming approach plays to the strengths of different agencies and instruments and the Government and its development partners will contribute to the following policies: National Climate Change Response Strategy, 2010, and National Climate Change Action Plan, 2013; National Social Protection Policy, 2012; National Food and Nutrition Security Policy, 2011; and the National Nutrition Action Plan, 2012-17 (15.2.4). A multi-sectoral approach to the situational analysis addressing agro-environmental concerns and agro-environmental sustainable measures are included in the objectives, particularly in the ASALs, owing to a number of distinctive features including remoteness, lack of infrastructure, and perennial drought (Table 1). Strong multi-agency collaboration is important for: the depth of inequality between many ASAL counties, particularly in access to basic infrastructure and services, is such that only a concerted and sustained effort over a long period of time by a critical mass of partners can reduce it (section 3). Texto completo Inglés