Ecolex Logo
El portal del
derecho ambiental
Resultados de la búsqueda » Jurisprudencia

Western Forest Products Limited v.Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented byThe Minister of Forests and Range and Forest Appeals Commission.

País/Territorio
Canadá
Tipo de la corte
Nacional - corte superior
Fecha
Ago 16, 2007
Fuente
UNEP, InforMEA
Nombre del tribunal
Court of Appeal
Sede de la corte
Vancouver
Juez
Prowse.
Número de referencia
2007 BCCA 418
Idioma
Inglés
Materia
Bosques, Cuestiones jurídicas
Palabra clave
Madera Cánones por explotación forestal/tarifas Corte y extracción/explotación forestal
Resumen
Western Forest Products Limited 2007 BCCA 418 (“Western”) applied for leave to appeal to the British Columbia Court of Appeal an order of a chambers judge, staying a 2005 decision of the Forest Appeals Commission. The Commission had found that a log dump in Jordan River was “not suitable” as an appraisal log dump for the purpose of calculating stumpage to be paid to the Province. The Court considered the criteria set out in Queens Plate Dev. Ltd. v. Vancouver Assessor, Area 09 (1987), 16 B.C.L.R. (2d) 104, including whether the appeal raised questions of statutory interpretation and whether there was some prospect of the appeal succeeding on its merits, and whether there was any clear benefit to be derived from the appeal. With respect to the merits test, the Court found that the chambers judge had incorrectly set fort the relevant standard of review to be applied to the Commission’s decision. The Court agreed with Western that adopting the correct standard of review was critical to a proper analysis by the chambers judge of the Commission’s decision, and found that the standard of review was a significant ground of appeal. The Court further determined that there was an arguable case that the chambers judge erred in his interpretation of section 4.1 of the Coast Appraisal Manual. The Court noted that the interpretation of that provision had been part of a continuing dispute between the Ministry and licensees, and that it raised questions as to the relevance of Ministry policies and the admissibility of certain types of evidence as aids to interpretation. The Court found these to be questions of general importance to the industry, and concluded that there was a clear benefit to the parties and others in having these issues addressed by the Court. As a result, the Court granted leave to appeal.
Texto completo
COU-156914.pdf