Town of Babylon v. Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency País/Territorio Estados Unidos de América Tipo de la corte Nacional - corte superior Fecha Oct 24, 2012 Fuente UNEP, InforMEA Nombre del tribunal United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit Juez Winter,Cabranes, Carney. Número de referencia Nos. 11-3408-cv, 11-3285-cv Idioma Inglés Materia Energía, Cuestiones jurídicas, Medio ambiente gen. Palabra clave Subvención/incentivo Conservación de energía/producción de energía Tecnología ambiental Resumen In 2010, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) warned Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and national banks that Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE)loans to homeowners with senior liens might pose risks to the institutions own security interests. Plaintiffs sued FHFA and OCC arguing that the warning discourages local participation in PACE initiatives. A district court dismissed the suits, and plaintiffs appealed Affirming the district court, the Second Circuit ruled that a 2008 federal law, 12 U.S.C. 4617, establishes FHFA as the federal conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and nothing in that law authorizes judicial review of FHFA decisions. As to OCC, the court held that plaintiffs lack standing under Article III of the Constitution. According to the court, plaintiffs cannot demonstrate redressabilityin essence, that the relief sought would resolve the problembecause, even if OCC withdrew its warning, “national banks would remain entirely free to treat PACE-related properties on an unfavorable basis.” Texto completo COU-159836.pdf