Ecolex Logo
El portal del
derecho ambiental
Resultados de la búsqueda » Jurisprudencia

Subash and Mani Lal Vs. Forest Range Officer.

País/Territorio
India
Tipo de la corte
Nacional - corte superior
Fecha
Ene 11, 2008
Fuente
UNEP, InforMEA
Nombre del tribunal
High Court of Madras
Juez
Regupathi, R.
Idioma
Inglés
Materia
Especies silvestres y ecosistemas
Palabra clave
Infracciones/sanciones Productos silvestres Especies de plantas protegidas Especies animales protegidas Especies de peces protegidas Cumplimiento/aplicación Protecíon de las especies
Resumen
The petitioner is alleged to have committed an offence punishable under Sections 3(2) r/w 7(1) of The Tamil Nadu Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949. The allegation is that the petitioners have installed 5 batteries and established electric fence around their Estate, violating the Orders passed by the Supreme Court in W.P. No. 202/95 and also Sections 32 and 33 of Wild Life Act, 1972. The judge doid not find any substance of merit in the allegation made in the complaint by the respondent for prosecuting the petitioners under Section 3(2) r/w 7(1) of The Tamil Nadu Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949 and therefore quashed the proceeding, as the installation of Solar Water Pumping System & Solar Power Fencing must be construed as agricultural implements and does not cause injury or death to wildlife nor denude the forest or diminish its utility as such.
Texto completo
COU-156250.pdf