Ecolex Logo
El portal del
derecho ambiental
Resultados de la búsqueda » Jurisprudencia

Sentencia R-11-2015

País/Territorio
Chile
Tipo de la corte
Nacional - corte superior
Fecha
Ago 4, 2015
Fuente
UNEP, InforMEA
Nombre del tribunal
Third Environmental Tribunal
Sede de la corte
Valdivia
Juez
Hantke Domas; Retamal Valenzuela; Villalobos Volpi
Número de referencia
Rol No. R-11-2015
Idioma
Español
Materia
Agua
Palabra clave
Aguas continentales Presa Cumplimiento/aplicación Acuerdo internacional-texto
Resumen

In this case, the plaintiff is challenging the administrative sanctions taken against him by the Superintendence for the Environment for not respecting the environmental legislation and building a dam and diverting the waters of the River Calle Calle.

The plaintiff alleged that his dam was not changing the course of the river and that consequently the administrative sanctions had to be lifted because there was no damage resulting from his activities.

The Environmental Tribunal held that the Superintendence for the Environment did not allow the plaintiff to have access to the evidences that were used to motivate the sanctions. As a result, the Tribunal considered that this constituted an essential procedural defect and consequently quashed the resolution of the Superintendence sanctioning the plaintiff.

Texto completo
Sentencia R-11-2015.pdf
Página web
www.tercertribunalambiental.cl