Grand Mines (Pty) Ltd v Giddey No. (183/97) [1998] ZASCA 99 País/Territorio Sudáfrica Tipo de la corte Nacional - corte superior Fecha Oct 23, 1998 Fuente UNEP, InforMEA Nombre del tribunal Supreme Court of Appeal Sede de la corte Bloemfontain Juez Schutz W. P. Número de referencia No. 183/97 Materia Cuestiones jurídicas, Recursos minerales Resumen This case concerns a contract between two parties. The exceptio non adimpleti contractus requires that obligations under the contract be reciprocal.This would mean that non-performance by one party would allow for the non-performance of another. Therefore, when Grand Mines paid for the coal did Bercon have an obligation to rehabilitate the mine?It was found that the obligations were not reciprocal as what the parties had contracted was clear in the terms of their agreement.The appeal brought by Grand Mines was dismissed. Texto completo Grand Mines (Pty) Ltd v Giddey NO (183 97) [1998] ZASCA 99.pdf 99.pdf Página web www.saflii.org