Gianni Bettati v. Safety Hi-Tech Srl País/Territorio Unión Europea, Italia Tipo de la corte Corte internacional Fecha Jul 14, 1998 Fuente UNEP, InforMEA Nombre del tribunal European Court of Justice Sede de la corte Luxembourg Juez G.C.Rodríguez Iglesias, C.Gulmann, H.Ragnemalm, H.Wathelet, G.FMancini, J.CMoitinho de AlmeidaLéger,Ioannou (Rapporteur), K.M.Sevón, L.Jann,, P.Edward,, D.A.O.Kapteyn,, P.J.G. Número de referencia C-341/95 Idioma Italiano Materia Medio ambiente gen., Aire y atmósfera Palabra clave Capa de ozono Contaminación del aire (fuentes fijas) Conservación del ecosistema Control de la contaminación Sustancias peligrosas Resumen Article 130r(1) of the Treaty authorises the adoption of measures relating solely to certain specified aspects of the environment, provided that such measures contribute to the preservation, protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. In Case 302/86 Commission v Denmark, the Court held that protection of the environment is an imperative requirement which may limit the application of Article 30 of the Treaty. As is clear from the objective of the Regulation and from the considerations set out in this judgment, a prohibition on the use and marketing of HCFCs which is designed to protect the ozone layer cannot be regarded as disproportionate to the aim pursued. Therefore, Council Regulation 3093/94 on substances that deplete the ozone layer is valid. Texto completo Gianni Bettati v. Safety Hi Tech Srl.pdf Página web curia.europa.eu