Ecolex Logo
El portal del
derecho ambiental
Resultados de la búsqueda » Jurisprudencia

FFAD - Entreprenorforeningens Affalds/Miljosektion, acting on behalf of Sydhavnens Sten & Grups ApS v. Kobenhavns Kommune

País/Territorio
Dinamarca, Unión Europea
Tipo de la corte
Corte internacional
Fecha
May 23, 2000
Fuente
UNEP, InforMEA
Nombre del tribunal
European Court of Justice
Sede de la corte
Luxembourg
Juez
Rodríguez Iglesias, G.C.
Moitinho de Almeida, J.C.
Edward, D.A.O.
Sevón, L.
Kapteyn, P.J.G.
Gulmann, C.
Jann, P.
Ragnemalm, H.
Wathelet,, M.
Léger, P.
Número de referencia
C-209/98
Idioma
Danés
Materia
Medio ambiente gen., Desechos y sustancias peligrosas
Palabra clave
Prevención de residuos Salud pública Reciclado/reutilización Eliminación de desechos Residuos peligrosos Gestión de desechos
Resumen
The case dealt with national rules allowing a commune, in the interest of capacity utilisation and the profitability of a limited number of undertakings, to exclude an undertaking, which is in other respects qualified, from taking part in the recycling of certain types of non-hazardous waste. Among other things, the ECJ explained that Article 34 (now: 29) stands in the way of measures that hinder the export of non-hazardous waste; neither Article 36 (now: 30) nor the rectification at source principle from Article 130R (now: 174) para 2 can alter this if the life or health of humans, animals or plants is not endangered. Article 90 (now 86) jo. 86 (now 82) does not preclude a municipal measure that aims at solving an environmental problem and limits the number of waste treatment companies in order to ensure that they receive enough waste.
Texto completo
liste.jsf