Ecolex Logo
El portal del
derecho ambiental
Resultados de la búsqueda » Jurisprudencia

Bona AB

País/Territorio
Suecia
Tipo de la corte
Nacional - corte superior
Fecha
Ene 22, 2009
Fuente
UNEP, InforMEA
Nombre del tribunal
Miljööverdomstolen
Sede de la corte
Stockholm
Número de referencia
M5741-07
Idioma
Sueco
Materia
Desechos y sustancias peligrosas
Resumen

A company, Bona AB, applied for an extended permit for their operations in Malmö. The company manufactured products for the maintenance of wooden floors, and thus required a permit to utilise certain chemicals. The conditions for the management of these chemicals were a key issue in the case and the argumentation was based on the precautionary principle.

The most debated condition was one prescribing that the company must not utilise chemicals when there is not sufficient information on the risks for nuisance for health and the environment. The condition moreover referred to Article 31 of the Reach Directive for an account of what information was required. A similar condition had previously been used in a case before the Environmental Court of Appeal, NJA 2006 s. 310.

The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, one of the opponents in the case, meant that this condition was too vague and imprecise.  It especially meant that the reference to the Reach Directive did not sufficiently clarify what information was required in order to utilise a certain chemical in the production.

The Environmental Court of Appeal stated that the requirement for a user of chemicals to provide information through safety data sheets makes sure the user acquires the necessary information. The Environmental Court of Appeal also reiterated that corresponding provisions directed at providers of chemicals had been seen as sufficiently precise to cause criminal liability. Therefore, the Environmental Court of Appeal concluded, it would be sufficiently precise as a condition for a user of chemicals.

Texto completo
M5741-07.pdf