Ecolex Logo
El portal del
derecho ambiental
Resultados de la búsqueda » Jurisprudencia

Birkett v DEFRA

País/Territorio
Reino Unido
Tipo de la corte
Nacional - corte superior
Fecha
Dic 21, 2011
Fuente
UNEP, InforMEA
Nombre del tribunal
Court of Appeal
Sede de la corte
London
Juez
Carnwath, Llloyd and Sullivan.
Número de referencia
[2011] EWCA Civ 1606
Idioma
Inglés
Materia
Aire y atmósfera, Cuestiones jurídicas, Medio ambiente gen.
Palabra clave
Calidad del aire/contaminación del aire Acceso-a-la-información
Resumen
The present case establishes that a public authority which has initially relied upon a particular exception when refusing to release the information can rely upon a different exception or exceptions in proceedings before the Information Commission and/or the First Tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) (Information Rights). The Court held that the challenge was premised on one important public interest—prompt disclosure—but there were other important public interests in play in the Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to information (OJ L41/26) including the public interests in the exception including privileged information and intellectual property rights. According to the Court, at the administrative review stage, which must be expeditious, the Commissioner has ample power to regulate the proceedings before him, for example by imposing a time limit for response. The Tribunal Procedure (First Tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 ensures that any new exception, if it is to be relied upon, is identified at the outset of the appeal and within a relatively short time. Mr Birkett argued that it was necessary to interpret Council Directive 2003/4/EC, on public access to environmental information, which implements the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, and in turn EIR 2004, as preventing a public authority from relying on a new or different exemption after the internal review stage; otherwise the complainant would not have an effective remedy because they would not know the reasons for the public authority’s refusal of their request for information. The Court of Appeal rejected Mr Birkett’s argument. As a result of this decision, the general rule is that public authorities can rely on any exception/ exemption at any time under EIR 2004 or FoIA.
Texto completo
COU-159751.pdf