Environmental quality and free trade: Interdependent goals or irreconcilable conflict? (Symposium) Author various authors Journal/Series Washington and Lee Law Review | Vol. 49(4); 1219 - 1508; 230 p. Date 1992 Source IUCN (ID: ANA-048111) Publisher | Place of publication Washington and Lee University School of Law | Lexington, VA, USA Document type Article in periodical Language English Field of application International Country/Territory United States of America, Canada Subject Environment gen. Keyword Economy and environment International trade Abstract Contents: 1. Environment and trade measures after the tuna/dolphin decision; 2. World trade rules and environmental policies: Congruence or conflict? 3. Resolving the trade and environment debate: In search of a neutral forum and neutral principles; 4. Appointments clause problems in the dispute resolution provisions of the United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement; 5. Can Buckley clear customs? 6. The appointments clause and international dispute settlement mechanisms: A false conflict; 7. International trade and environment: lessons from the federal experience; 8. A Kantian approach to trade and the environment; 9. The international trade regime and the municipal law of federal states: How close a fit? 10.The need for an international dispute panel: Position, consensus and interdependent goals; 11.Reconciling international trade with the preservation of the global commons: Can we prosper and protect? 12.Appointments with disaster: The unconstitutionality of binational arbitral review under the United States-Canada Free Agreement Trade; 13.The transformation of trans-substantivity.