Ecolex Logo
The gateway to
environmental law
Search results » Literature

Bypassing the ‘ratification straitjacket’: reviewing US legal participation in a climate agreement

Author
Kemp L
Journal/Series
Climate Policy | Vol. 16 (8), p. 1011-1028
Date
2016
Source
IUCN (ID: ANA-091037)
Publisher | Place of publication
Taylor & Francis | Oxon, United Kingdom
ISSN
1469-3062
Document type
Article in periodical
Language
English
Country/Territory
United States of America
Subject
Legal questions
Keyword
Climate change International agreement-text Law reform/harmonization/deregulation National implementation/transposal
Abstract

The issue of US ratification of international environmental treaties is a recurring obstacle for environmental multilateralism, including the climate regime. Despite the perceived importance of the role of the US to the success of any future international climate agreement, there has been little direct coverage in terms of how an effective agreement can specifically address US legal participation. This article explores potential ways of allowing for US legal participation in an effective climate treaty. Possible routes forward include the use of domestic legislation such as section 115 (S115) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the use of sole–executive agreements, instead of Senate ratification. Legal participation from the US through sole–executive agreements is possible if the international architecture is designed to allow for their use. Architectural elements such as varying legality and participation across an agreement (variable geometry) could allow for the use of sole–executive agreements. Two broader models for a 2015 agreement with legal participation through sole–executive agreements are constructed based upon these options: a modified pledge and review system and a form of variable geometry composed of number of opt-out, voting-based protocols on specific issues accompanied by bilateral agreements on mitigation commitments with other major emitters through the use of S115 and sole–executive agreements under the Montreal Protocol and Chicago Convention (‘Critical Mass Governance'). While there is no single solution, Critical Mass Governance appears to provide the optimum combination of tools to effectively allow for US legal participation whilst ensuring an effective treaty.

Other references

Legislation

Clean Air Act.

Legislation | United States of America | 1990 (2004)

Keyword: Basic legislation, Pollution control, Ozone layer, Air quality/air pollution, Climate change, Emissions, Monitoring, Environmental planning, Enforcement/compliance, Offences/penalties, Environmental standards

Source: FAO, FAOLEX