× Information on this section of ECOLEX comes from the InforMEA Portal which compiled information from MEA Secretariats with the support of the European Union. The accuracy of the information displayed is the responsibility of the originating data source. In case of discrepancy the information as displayed on the respective MEA website prevails. Work programme on endosulfan Document type Decision Reference number SC-6/8 Date Apr 28, 2013 SourceUNEP, InforMEA Status Active Subject Waste & hazardous substances Keyword Hazardous substances Treaty Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (Sep 21, 2001) Meeting Ordinary and extraordinary meetings of the conferences of the parties to the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions Website www.informea.org Full text UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.English.doc UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.Arabic.pdf UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.Spanish.doc UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.French.pdf UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.Spanish.pdf UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.English.pdf UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.French.doc UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.Chinese.doc UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.Russian.pdf UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.Chinese.pdf UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.Russian.doc UNEP-POPS-COP.6-SC-6-8.Arabic.doc Abstract The Conference of the Parties Recognizing that the assessment of chemical and non-chemical alternatives to endosulfan carried out by the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee should not be seen as a comprehensive and detailed assessment of all available information and that failure to meet the thresholds of the persistent organic pollutant characteristics should not be taken as evidence that any of the chemicals assessed is not a persistent organic pollutant,