The Moldsilva case Type of court National - higher court Date Jun 23, 2008 Source UNEP, InforMEA Court name Curtea de Apel Chisinau Reference number No. 3 2039/2008 Language Romanian Subject Environment gen., Legal questions Keyword Public participation Access-to-information Abstract A non-governmental organization, Eco-TIRAS International Environmental Association of River Keepers (Eco-TIRAS), submitted a request to the State Forestry Agency ‘Moldsilva (a government agency) for the disclosure of a number of contracts for the rent of lands administered by the State Forestry Fund. Moldsilva refused this request on the grounds of the large volume of the requested information, and also asked the NGO to justify its interest in that information. The request for information was repeated, as was the refusal. The second time Moldsilva referred to the newly passed Governmental Regulation No. 187 that stipulated that the Agency had an obligation to keep confidential from third parties such information, and that if it failed to do so, the Agency would risk having to pay for any damages caused. None of the two letters of refusal provided the NGO with information on access to a review procedure. Eco-TIRAS then brought an action in the Court of Appeal Chisinau challenging this decision and claiming that Moldsilva was obligated to provide the copies of all contracts as requested. The administrative action relied on the relevant provisions of Moldovan legislation, namely articles 21 and 25 of the Law on Access to Information and articles 5, 14, 16, 24 and 25, paragraph 1 (b), of the Law on Administrative Courts, and also referred to the definition of ‘environmental information contained in article 2.3 of the Aarhus Convention.