Ecolex Logo
The gateway to
environmental law
Search results » Jurisprudence

The Environment Agency v. Brock Plc

Country/Territory
United Kingdom
Type of court
Others
Date
Feb 16, 1998
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Court name
Queen’s Bench Division
Judge
Roch
Potts
Reference number
(1998) 4 PLR 37
Language
English
Subject
Waste & hazardous substances
Keyword
Liability/compensation Hazardous substances
Abstract
It was alleged that on 2 December 1996, Brock Plc had caused polluting matter, namely tip leachate, to enter a ditch, a tributary of the River Dibbin from Hooton landfill site at Ellesmere Port contrary to Section 85 (1) and (6) of the Water Resources Act 1991. The magistrates acquitted the company but stated a case for the opinion of the High Court. The central question was whether on the facts found by the magistrates they were able to find that the company had not caused the entry of leachate into the ditch because the company had not known of its escape. The court held that the magistrates were not aware at the time of their decision of the decision of the House of Lords in the Empress Car Company (Abertillery) Ltd v. National Rivers Authority Case making it clear that liability under Section 85 (1) is not based on negligence but is strict. The matter was remitted back to the magistrates with a direction to convict the company.
Full text
Nation.Deci._Vol_3=prelims.pdf
Available in
UNEP/UNDP/Dutch Government Joint Project on Environmental Law in Africa, Compendium of Judicial Decisions on Matters related to Environment, National Decisions, Volume III, Page 230