Ecolex Logo
The gateway to
environmental law
Search results » Jurisprudence

Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc., Appellant, and Buller District Council, First Respondent, and West Coast Regional Council, Second Respondent, and Solid Energy New Zealand Limited, Third Respondent

Country/Territory
New Zealand
Type of court
Others
Date
Dec 21, 2005
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Court name
High Court of New Zealand
Judge
Panckhurst
Reference number
CIV-2005-485-001240
Language
English
Subject
Mineral resources
Keyword
Mining Legal proceedings/administrative proceedings
Abstract
Solid Energy New Zealand had been granted a resource consent enabling it to develop and operate an open cast coalmine. The Environment Court had upheld the consent subject to conditions. The Forest and Bird Protection Society appealed to this court. The mine footprint included red tussock wetland which comprised significant indigenous vegetation. Solid Energy was required to transfer a 12 hectare area of red tussock wetland to an intermediate site and then relocate it back in the mined area after coal extraction was finished. The Society contended that there was no evidence that the direct transfer and relocation of 12 hectares of wetland was feasible. The Court analyzed the judgment of the Environment Court and decided that the findings of the Environment Court had to be viewed from the perspective that they were made by a specialist Court, which was frequently confronted with conflicting scientific evidence as to future events. It was of the view that the judgment of the Environment Court involved a margin of appreciation which it was impossible for this Court to match. Therefore, it was not persuaded that the Court erred by imposing the conditions relating to the direct transfer of red tussock wetland. Furthermore, the Court did appropriately assess the potential effects and impacts which the proposed mining activity entailed. The appeal was dismissed.
Full text
jdo.justice.govt.nz