Ecolex Logo
The gateway to
environmental law
Search results » Jurisprudence

KHO:2006:37

Country/Territory
Finland
Type of court
National - higher court
Date
Jun 16, 2006
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Court name
Korkein hallinto-oikeus
Seat of court
Helsinki
Reference number
KHO:2006:37
Language
Finnish
Subject
Forestry
Keyword
Forest species Management/conservation Access-to-justice Biodiversity
Abstract

The case concerned the interpretation of section 10 of the Forest Act regarding the preservation of diversity and habitats of special importance. Paragraph 2 of the provision establishes which habitats are of special importance for forest diversity and paragraph 3 stipulates that the management and utilisation measures concerning these areas must be carried out in a manner which preserves the special features of the habitats if they are (1) in a natural state or resembling a natural state and (2) are clearly distinguishable from their surroundings.

 

The court stated that the distinguishability concerns the object itself and that it must not actually be distinguishable in the terrain. The court also was of the opinion that the Forest Centre could give its advance ruling on a forest use declaration without being bound to the delimitation of the object in the same way as in the application. The Forest Centre was in the case of the opinion that the object was larger than the applicant meant. Because this opinion was not binding, the applicant could not appeal the opinion. Neither was the conditions for forest use that the Forest Centre gave, binding upon the applicant as the Forest Centre acted beyond its competence. Consequently, the applicant had no right to appeal.

Full text
KHO-2006-37.pdf