Ecolex Logo
The gateway to
environmental law
Search results » Jurisprudence

Friends of the Earth, Inc., et al. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.

Country/Territory
United States of America
Type of court
National - higher court
Date
Jan 12, 2000
Source
UNEP, InforMEA
Court name
Supreme Court of the United States
Seat of court
Washington D.C.
Judge
Ginsburg
Rehnquist
, Stevens
OConnor
, Kennedy
Souter
Breyer
, Stevens
, Kennedy
Scalia
Thomas
Reference number
No. 98-822
Language
English
Subject
Water, Legal questions
Keyword
Access-to-justice Legal proceedings/administrative proceedings Effluent waste water/discharge Offences/penalties Recreational water use
Abstract
Defendant-respondent Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc., bought a wastewater treatment plant in South Carolina. Laidlaw began to discharge various pollutants into the waterway. These discharges, particularly of mercury, repeatedly exceeded the limits set by a discharge permit Laidlaw had obtained. Plaintiff-petitioners Friends of the Earth filed this citizen suit against Laidlaw, alleging noncompliance with the permit and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and an award of civil penalties. Laidlaw contended that the Plaintiff-petitioners lacked standing to bring the lawsuit. Laidlaw also argued that the case was moot because it had ceased polluting, and had closed the factory responsible for the pollution complained of. The Supreme Court held that the plaintiff-petitioners had reasonable concerns about the effects of those discharges, directly affecting their recreational, aesthetic, and economic interests. This was enough to adequately document an injury in fact. Therefore the plaintiff-petitioners had standing to bring the suit. Besides that, a citizen suitor’s claim for civil penalties could not be dismissed as moot when the defendant, after commencement of the litigation, had come into compliance with its discharge permit. The violations could continue if undeterred by the fine sought. A case could only become moot if subsequent events made it absolutely clear that the allegedly wrongful behavior could not reasonably be expected to recur.
Full text
getcase.pl

References

Cites
Cited by