Disposal of wastewater – removal of damage Country/Territory Morocco Date Nov 25, 2014 Source UNEP, InforMEA Court name Court of Cassation Seat of court Rabat Language English Abstract If the case t is about removing damage and not about claiming ownership, then the court is not entitled to investigate ownership.The court establish from the observation done in first instance the existence of wastewater outlet with polluted water going through west ofthe defendant’s house and extending from the plaintiff’s house who has the ability to dispose of it from another side towards the public road, andconfirmed the first instance decision ruling to remove damage by closing the outlet, and thus its decision is well grounded and legally based. Howeverthe court when not taking notice that the damage is old does not affect the case because it is about wastewater and it is among changeable damagesthat do not remain in still state, whereas the appellant not having another outlet was proven false when the court established the possibilityof disposing wastewater towards the public road, and from another side, filing a request for right of servitude is not the subject of this case,while the principle of damage cannot be removed by bigger damage was answered in the decision by the possibility of opening the outlet towardsthe public road. Available in Court of Cassation’s Decisions on the environment